What is a good reason for delivering error augmented feedback over non-error feedback?

• A. Actively engages the student in the learning process
• B. Confuses the learner
• C. Decreases motivation
• D. Takes longer to deliver

Answer: (A)

Error augmented feedback works by highlighting exactly where the action diverged from the goal, which pulls the learner into analyzing their movement and selecting corrective adjustments. This kind of feedback prompts active processing: the student must compare the intended outcome to what happened, identify contributing factors, and plan a concrete fix for the next attempt. That engagement strengthens the internal error-detection system and fosters self-regulation, so improvements come faster and stickier because the learner builds a clearer model of how to produce the desired result. In contrast, non-error feedback—like generic praise or notes that the result was off without specifics—tends to leave gaps in understanding and reduces the learner’s drive to solve the problem. Used thoughtfully, error augmented feedback makes errors actionable, guiding the learner toward more effective adjustments on subsequent attempts.